Comment 2 for bug 1671733
Revision history for this message
| Felipe Reyes (freyes) wrote Re: [Bug 1671733] Re: harvest mode setting not honoured by destroy-model | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
a60fb26
(Get the code!)
Hi John,
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 05:00:21PM -0000, John A Meinel wrote:
> The lifetimes of machines deployed by Juju are intentionally tied to the
> lifetime of the model. We don't support identifying already running
> machines which means that those machines would just become orphaned and it
> would not be possible to control them under Juju again.
Something that I found strange on this behavior is that after you ran
"juju remove-machine X" that machine won't be displayed to the user in
"juju status" which it's consistent with the operation remove-machine, so
if remove-machine did release the resource, why later (could be minutes,
days, months) juju will release the machine in maas during
destroy-model?.
> Harvest mode was never intended to support this. Is there a concrete reason
> why you want to deploy but never operate those machines afterward?
Frode found this during the exploration of possible workarounds for the
bug https:/
Best,