So the 2.1 release date was "expected" over 20 days ago and nothing newer
is forecast. This project may benefit from a tighter ship on the scheduling
side. Let me know if you think there is value in persuing this. I am happy
to help as long as its not disruptive.
On Feb 3, 2017 2:11 PM, "Sandor Zeestraten" <email address hidden> wrote:
So the 2.1 release date was "expected" over 20 days ago and nothing newer
is forecast. This project may benefit from a tighter ship on the scheduling
side. Let me know if you think there is value in persuing this. I am happy
to help as long as its not disruptive.
On Feb 3, 2017 2:11 PM, "Sandor Zeestraten" <email address hidden> wrote:
> @spyderdyne Though not ideal, the milestones might give a better clue /launchpad. net/juju/ +milestones /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1633788 /bugs.launchpad .net/charm- test-infra/ +bug/1633788/ +subscriptions
> https:/
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> juju 2.0.0 bootstrap to lxd fails (connect to wrong "remote" IP
> address)
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>