Canonical Juju

  1. Bug #1603473
  2. Comment #35

Comment 35 for bug 1603473

Revision history for this message
Rajesh Kumar Chaturvedi (rajesh-canonical) wrote : Re: Relation fails as untis/machines are on different subnet on a multi NIC setup, juju 2.0 beta11

@Mick Gregg,

Sure, will provide you access, Please contact John over email.

2ndly your suggested workaround #32 worked fine, but as I am trying to deploy openstack which has many applications and that resides on 2-3 hosts and various lxd container's, So in this approach I need to define many <curtin_userdata_amd64_generic_trusty_<hostname>> and similarly their respective interface_d files in /v/w/h/ directory. This approach looks very painful and big manual dependency.

So can we not try 2nd approach of lower IP addrs sorting way. Please help me understanding this concept of IP addrs sorting.

How come in your case 192.168.123.0/24 is lower sort order than 192.168.124.0/24?
and similarly in my case 10.10.11.0/24 is lower sort order than 10.9.1.0/24?

Once this concept get clarity then will make that thumb rule in our upcoming deployments and developments.