Canonical Juju

  1. Bug #1603473
  2. Comment #26

Comment 26 for bug 1603473

Revision history for this message
Rajesh Kumar Chaturvedi (rajesh-canonical) wrote : Re: Relation fails as untis/machines are on different subnet on a multi NIC setup, juju 2.0 beta11

@Mick Gregg

I am trying as you suggested to add maas preseed, But I would like to update you that, I am already using lower sort order net for PXE/DHCP address i.e. (10.9.1.0/24) and for unmanaged net address is (10.10.11.0/24) as per #16.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1603473/comments/16

Definitely address (10.9.1.0/24) is lower sort order than (10.10.11.0/24), and this should be assign to various nodes and should not matter statically assigned at Maas or via preseed.

I have another setup with similar network address (10.14.0.0/24) for managed and (192.168.7.0/24) for unmanaged with juju 2.0 beta5, where this ip assignment work perfectly as desired for various nodes.