Was the behavior of rsyslog as described in Bug #1683075, by any chance? I'm assuming not, as after the resolution of this bug no other problems were reported(?).
Just trying to confirm if *3075 is still an unresolved issue.
Was the behavior of rsyslog as described in Bug #1683075, by any chance?
I'm assuming not, as after the resolution of this bug no other problems
were reported(?).
Just trying to confirm if *3075 is still an unresolved issue.