Comment 8 for bug 1394755

the clarification is helpful, but the issue also prevents ha from being
useable w/ manual provider which hopefully is not an edge case. the
container workaround sounds viable.

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Dean Henrichsmeyer <
<email address hidden>> wrote:

> To be clear, the driver of this is not deployment. When deploying we can
> easily ensure-availability and then do what we need to do with the
> machine.
>
> The problem is when you have a deployed environment using available
> hardware and then a node that is a state server dies. As it stands now,
> you can't get Juju back into HA because it can't use an existing node. I
> just wanted to add some clarification to the use case.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju-
> core.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394755
>
> Title:
> juju ensure-availability should be able to target existing machines
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1394755/+subscriptions
>