Comment 4 for bug 1280852

Revision history for this message
John A Meinel (jameinel) wrote : Re: [Bug 1280852] Re: juju specifies obsolete, more expensive, and worse performing instance types on aws

I think this is 1.17.4 if we merged the 1.16 branch in time. We should
audit for that.

John
=:->
On Feb 20, 2014 3:11 PM, "Curtis Hovey" <email address hidden> wrote:

> ** Changed in: juju-core
> Milestone: 1.17.3 => 1.18.0
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280852
>
> Title:
> juju specifies obsolete, more expensive, and worse performing instance
> types on aws
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1280852/+subscriptions
>