The fix should also be on trunk.. not just the stable branch.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:51 AM, John A Meinel <email address hidden>wrote:
> ** Changed in: juju-core > Status: Triaged => In Progress > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280852 > > Title: > juju specifies obsolete, more expensive, and worse performing instance > types on aws > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1280852/+subscriptions >
The fix should also be on trunk.. not just the stable branch.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:51 AM, John A Meinel <email address hidden>wrote:
> ** Changed in: juju-core /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1280852 /bugs.launchpad .net/juju- core/+bug/ 1280852/ +subscriptions
> Status: Triaged => In Progress
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> juju specifies obsolete, more expensive, and worse performing instance
> types on aws
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>