It was unknown to me that if an install hook fails, 'resolved' is needed.
A friendly hint from destroy-service when it thinks an error needs resolving first would be fantastic (think of git friendlyness) - now it just siltently does it's job but the service doesn't really die because the unit is in error.
It was unknown to me that if an install hook fails, 'resolved' is needed.
A friendly hint from destroy-service when it thinks an error needs resolving first would be fantastic (think of git friendlyness) - now it just siltently does it's job but the service doesn't really die because the unit is in error.