Comment 9 for bug 1174610

I agree that it is an important bug, but we are no worse in 1.18 vs 1.16 so
we don't need to block releasing 1.18 on fixing the bug.

John
=:->
On Feb 26, 2014 1:51 PM, "Kapil Thangavelu" <email address hidden>
wrote:

> its more than just a regression issue, its a loss of identity across
> relations which can lead to data loss and corruption. lots of charms use
> related unit id for uniquely characterizing data from a remote system.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:46 AM, John A Meinel <<email address hidden>
> >wrote:
>
> > Ah, I see. This is a regression relative to python-juju, not to an
> > earlier version of juju-core, so it isn't quite "regression" for what I
> > think we were using it as (stuff that blocks the next release)
> >
> > --
> > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> > report.
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174610
> >
> > Title:
> > unit ids should be unique
> >
> > To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1174610/+subscriptions
> >
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju-
> core.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174610
>
> Title:
> unit ids should be unique
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1174610/+subscriptions
>