>>>>>>Richard wrote:
>>>IMHO, we should keep the Super Type Token and add constructors which accept >>>Classes as arguments.
I don't like adding constructor with .class types as arguments which i think is almost same as requiring users to pass in instance you mentioned in #a. I feel api looks ugly when end user has to pass in .class types as arguments
>>>>>>Richard wrote:
>>>IMHO, we should keep the Super Type Token and add constructors which accept >>>Classes as arguments.
I don't like adding constructor with .class types as arguments which i think is almost same as requiring users to pass in instance you mentioned in #a. I feel api looks ugly when end user has to pass in .class types as arguments