Comment 4 for bug 470811

Revision history for this message
Juan Pablo (jp-garcia-ortiz) wrote :

Yes, that´s a good idea. Currently the mean of "0.0" as unlimited for the maximum cache size is not explained at all in the program, so it´d be really good to clarify it with what you propose.

The "Occupied size" should work. At least it worked, but maybe some changes in the code affected this feature. I´ll check it ASAP.