From my point of view there is nothing wrong with udns.
And current implementation has big advantages of:
- already exists and does not need writing
- is battle-tested and works fine in real life deployments
But as always - if someone is willing to submit a working patch with another stub resolver implementation, I'm very happy to accept it.
BTW: This is exactly the way udns was introduced to jabberd2. :-)
From my point of view there is nothing wrong with udns.
And current implementation has big advantages of:
- already exists and does not need writing
- is battle-tested and works fine in real life deployments
http:// bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 493599# 10 explains throughly why Debian decision of removing udns is bogus.
But as always - if someone is willing to submit a working patch with another stub resolver implementation, I'm very happy to accept it.
BTW: This is exactly the way udns was introduced to jabberd2. :-)