Comment 4 for bug 2040236

So going to clarify concerns here:

1:

The prose says we want a conductor config override, but the example code implements a node-level override as well. We are only OK with implementing a conductor config override, but doing a node-level override is not a good idea because it's an API-exposed configuration without an API-exposed manner for that CA to go into place.

2:

The proposal wants to add [conductor]/default_verify_ca_path, but example code is for iRMC. If we are adding this config at [conductor], we must add support at a higher level than iRMC driver.