On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Fernando Perez <email address hidden> wrote:
> However, it doesn't change the resolution for this bug, which was for
> 'setup.py install', because for the install command, we are not going
> to pull setuptools in, as that's where the easy-install.pth mess
> happens.
Yes. The only reason for us to use setuptools is that it creates nice
.exe wrappers on Windows.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Fernando Perez <email address hidden> wrote:
> However, it doesn't change the resolution for this bug, which was for
> 'setup.py install', because for the install command, we are not going
> to pull setuptools in, as that's where the easy-install.pth mess
> happens.
Yes. The only reason for us to use setuptools is that it creates nice
.exe wrappers on Windows.
Does using "--single- version- externally- managed" avoid the undesired packages. python. org/distribute/ setuptools. html#install- run-easy- install- or-old- style-installat ion
side-effects (at least, it does not install .pth files)?
http://
-srid
PS: the bug resolution is fine with me; I can configure ipython to use
setupegg.py script instead.