On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Ville M. Vainio <email address hidden> wrote:
> I am not questioning your patch - rather, I'm thinking that if we
> leave in the interactive event loop, we can make ipython interface
> with gtk in a single threaded (read: robust and simple) fashion, just
> like it does with tk.
>
> This is definitely something that should be investigated.
+1: it would be a fantastic 0.10 material if we could figure out more
robust implementations of this stuff. You (Ville) also mentioned a
while ago the possibility of having tk-like versions of all the gui
support via pyoshook, perhaps accessed via ctypes. If you can have a
stab at prototyping this out, it would be great for 0.10.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Ville M. Vainio <email address hidden> wrote:
> I am not questioning your patch - rather, I'm thinking that if we
> leave in the interactive event loop, we can make ipython interface
> with gtk in a single threaded (read: robust and simple) fashion, just
> like it does with tk.
>
> This is definitely something that should be investigated.
+1: it would be a fantastic 0.10 material if we could figure out more
robust implementations of this stuff. You (Ville) also mentioned a
while ago the possibility of having tk-like versions of all the gui
support via pyoshook, perhaps accessed via ctypes. If you can have a
stab at prototyping this out, it would be great for 0.10.
Cheers,
f