Packages' priorities should be in line with Debian policy
We should update the control files in our packages to be more in line with Debian policy.
Currently many of our packages have the priority set to important, which is clearly not correct.
Debian policy defines pretty well what the various priorities mean. Most of our packages should be optional, but a few of them should probably be extra.
|Tim Abbott (tabbott) wrote : Re: [Bug 307727] [NEW] Packages' priorities should be in line with Debian policy||#1|
|Changed in invirt:|
|status:||New → Confirmed|
|importance:||Undecided → Low|