On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 08:29:24PM -0500, Tim Abbott wrote:
> It may also be relevant to be aware that increasing the priority of a
> package from optional to extra is harder than setting it to optional in
> the first place.
Increasing from extra to optional, I think you mean. (I had to look
up which was higher than which to work out where your typo was.)
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 08:29:24PM -0500, Tim Abbott wrote:
> It may also be relevant to be aware that increasing the priority of a
> package from optional to extra is harder than setting it to optional in
> the first place.
Increasing from extra to optional, I think you mean. (I had to look
up which was higher than which to work out where your typo was.)
Greg