Difference in rendering reproduced with Inkscape 0.48.2 and 0.48+devel r10860 on OS X Lion,
compared to how Firefox 9 and Chromium 18 render the file
Note:
- while Opera 11.6 and Squiggle (Batik 1.7) also appear to render the two versions identically, they do not agree with Firefox and Chromium about how to render the radial gradients of the stacked objects in the background.
- rsvg-view doesn't render the objects stacked in the background, and also shows a difference (in the background) between the two versions.
Any chance to get a more reduced test case?
<off-topic>
BTW - Squiggle (Batik 1.7) initially refused to open both SVG files with the error message
Unsupport SVG version '1'
Changing 'version="1"' to 'version="1.0"' fixed that.
<http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/struct.html#SVGElementVersionAttribute>
</off-topic>
Difference in rendering reproduced with Inkscape 0.48.2 and 0.48+devel r10860 on OS X Lion,
compared to how Firefox 9 and Chromium 18 render the file
Note:
- while Opera 11.6 and Squiggle (Batik 1.7) also appear to render the two versions identically, they do not agree with Firefox and Chromium about how to render the radial gradients of the stacked objects in the background.
- rsvg-view doesn't render the objects stacked in the background, and also shows a difference (in the background) between the two versions.
Any chance to get a more reduced test case?
<off-topic> www.w3. org/TR/ SVG11/struct. html#SVGElement VersionAttribut e>
BTW - Squiggle (Batik 1.7) initially refused to open both SVG files with the error message
Unsupport SVG version '1'
Changing 'version="1"' to 'version="1.0"' fixed that.
<http://
</off-topic>