Alvin Penner wrote > okay, how about rev 10183.
Yes (as asked earlier: "are are r9965 and r10183 save to backport to the 0.48.x branch?"). To summarize for DXF input:
Proposed revisions for backporting (tag 'backport-proposed'): bug #739803: r10131 bug #685707: r9965, r10183 bug #656899: r9824
No packport of r9629, r9642 and r10192 due to string changes.
Changelog: <http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~inkscape.dev/inkscape/trunk/changes?filter_file_id=dxf_input.py-20091128124040-aej0x7yhxng1m6ly-12068>
Alvin Penner wrote
> okay, how about rev 10183.
Yes (as asked earlier: "are are r9965 and r10183 save to backport to the 0.48.x branch?"). To summarize for DXF input:
Proposed revisions for backporting (tag 'backport- proposed' ):
bug #739803: r10131
bug #685707: r9965, r10183
bug #656899: r9824
No packport of r9629, r9642 and r10192 due to string changes.
Changelog: bazaar. launchpad. net/~inkscape. dev/inkscape/ trunk/changes? filter_ file_id= dxf_input. py-200911281240 40-aej0x7yhxng1 m6ly-12068>
<http://