> which application did you use to render the SVG files
> for your comparison?
comment #2:
Inkscape 0.47, Inkscape 0.47+devel r9456, Squiggle (Batik 1.7) / OS X 10.5.8,
comment #3:
Inkscape 0.47 (scour 0.22) and revision 9433 (scour 0.24) / Windows XP
> I see no such "large black triangle" in your image,
> but I do see the green at the upper-left corner "bleed" a lot.
In Inkscape change to 'Outline' or 'No Filter' view mode: without the SVG filter effect (Blur) you can see that some points of the path are displaced.
> I'm running Eye of GNOME from Ubuntu Karmic with a librsvg
> containing a fix for bug 370061. This may actually affect
> your rendering a lot.
(Inkscape's reference SVG renderer is Batik (or Adobe), not librsvg). See attached screenshot of '587746-svgcorrupttest-r9456-optimized.svg' in Inkscape (r9490): the nodes are actually misplaced, and it is not the Inkscape rendering issue as described in bug #370061 comment #4.
> which application did you use to render the SVG files
> for your comparison?
comment #2:
Inkscape 0.47, Inkscape 0.47+devel r9456, Squiggle (Batik 1.7) / OS X 10.5.8,
comment #3:
Inkscape 0.47 (scour 0.22) and revision 9433 (scour 0.24) / Windows XP
> I see no such "large black triangle" in your image,
> but I do see the green at the upper-left corner "bleed" a lot.
In Inkscape change to 'Outline' or 'No Filter' view mode: without the SVG filter effect (Blur) you can see that some points of the path are displaced.
> I'm running Eye of GNOME from Ubuntu Karmic with a librsvg
> containing a fix for bug 370061. This may actually affect
> your rendering a lot.
(Inkscape's reference SVG renderer is Batik (or Adobe), not librsvg). See attached screenshot of '587746- svgcorrupttest- r9456-optimized .svg' in Inkscape (r9490): the nodes are actually misplaced, and it is not the Inkscape rendering issue as described in bug #370061 comment #4.