Krzysztof Kosinski wrote:
> It's better to use the more widely supported tar.lzma archives.
This is a very bad idea. The lzma-alone (.lzma) format is deprecated; it
lacks magic bytes and integrity checking. The efficiency of a program
can be improved; the shortcomings of a format are for ever.
> And the most important benefit is that they can be created and
> decompressed directly with GNU tar using the --lzma option, e.g.
Lzip files can be created the same way with tar 1.23:
tar --lzip -xf inkscape-0.47.tar.lz
Or with the -I option for older versions of tar:
tar -xf inkscape-0.47.tar.lz -Ilzip
Dear Krzysztof,
Krzysztof Kosinski wrote:
> It's better to use the more widely supported tar.lzma archives.
This is a very bad idea. The lzma-alone (.lzma) format is deprecated; it
lacks magic bytes and integrity checking. The efficiency of a program
can be improved; the shortcomings of a format are for ever.
> And the most important benefit is that they can be created and
> decompressed directly with GNU tar using the --lzma option, e.g.
Lzip files can be created the same way with tar 1.23: 0.47.tar. lz
tar --lzip -xf inkscape-
Or with the -I option for older versions of tar: 0.47.tar. lz -Ilzip
tar -xf inkscape-
Regards,
Antonio.