Comment 1 for bug 246471
Revision history for this message
| bbyak (buliabyak) wrote Re: [Bug 246471] [NEW] CALLIGRAPHY TOOL: Sliders should be considered a regression | #1 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Troy James Sobotka <email address hidden>
> Summary: Despite trying to love and adore the new sliders, they simply
> don't offer the granularity that the older spin boxes did. It was
> previously simple to specify 2.0 for a value, for example.
I can easily drag to 2.6. Or I can right-click and choose 3. I can add
2 to the right-click menu if you want.
What other exact values you need? More importantly, why and when do
you need to set calligraphic width precisely at all? This is an
extremely imprecise tool by its very nature.