Comment 14 for bug 1659229

Revision history for this message
su_v (suv-lp) wrote : Re: [Bug 1659229] Re: Improve message in pre-0.92 file dpi upgrade

On 2017-01-29 13:16 (+0100), Eduard Braun wrote:
> Is this how it's supposed to look?
> I'm missing a bit of indentation for the two "physical" selection options.

Yes, that's how it currently is implemented (no indentation of the
nested radio option). Mc mentioned in this regard on irc:
> [3]memorizing is done, indent is not (I don't know how (yet))