Comment 24 for bug 691721

Revision history for this message
Marco Gavanelli (marco-gavanelli) wrote : Re: Only one core managing with indicator-cpufreq.

Well, 3^4 is not a big number, and each icon would cost only a few kB on your disk. Even if you plan to keep all of them in RAM, it would be about, say, 100kB? My system monitor says that currently indicator-cpufreq needs about 11MB of memory, so it would be an increase of less than 1%. And I guess most people do not have 4 cores with 3 CPUs (and, if they do they have quite a powerful system, so maybe they can waste some RAM for the icons).