On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 16:33 -0700, Derick Eddington wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 18:43 +0000, leppie wrote:
> > 5. &trace: #<syntax (begin) [char 676 of srfi/tests/multi-dimensional-arrays.sps]>
> > 6. &trace: #<syntax (past)>
> The new issue is the empty (begin) forms.
> So, if that program works, then so should the intermixed empty (begin)
> forms in the expansion of srfi/tests/multi-dimensional-arrays.sps.
Never mind. Top-level intermixed empty (begin) forms are not the
problem. The problem is the (past) expressions, in the definition of
tail, expanding into (begin) which is not a valid expression. Ikarus
wasn't catching this mistake of mine before.
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 16:33 -0700, Derick Eddington wrote: multi-dimension al-arrays. sps]>
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 18:43 +0000, leppie wrote:
> > 5. &trace: #<syntax (begin) [char 676 of srfi/tests/
> > 6. &trace: #<syntax (past)>
> The new issue is the empty (begin) forms.
> So, if that program works, then so should the intermixed empty (begin) multi-dimension al-arrays. sps.
> forms in the expansion of srfi/tests/
Never mind. Top-level intermixed empty (begin) forms are not the
problem. The problem is the (past) expressions, in the definition of
tail, expanding into (begin) which is not a valid expression. Ikarus
wasn't catching this mistake of mine before.