Is there a reason why ETXTBSY is not included in the middle check.
My manpage says:
[EROFS] Write access is requested for a file on a read-only file system.
[ETXTBSY] Write access is requested for a pure procedure (shared text) file presently being executed.
[EACCES] Permission bits of the file mode do not permit the requested access, or search permission is denied on a component of the path prefix. The owner of a file has permission checked with respect to the ``owner'' read, write, and execute mode bits, members of the file's group other than the owner have permission checked with respect to the ``group'' mode bits, and all oth- ers have permissions checked with respect to the ``other'' mode bits.
In the patch, there is:
+ r = access(fn, c_how);
+ if (r == 0)
+ return true_object;
+ else if (errno == EACCES || errno == EROFS)
+ return false_object;
+ else
+ return ik_errno_to_code();
+}
Is there a reason why ETXTBSY is not included in the middle check.
My manpage says:
[EROFS] Write access is requested for a file on a read-only
file system.
[ETXTBSY] Write access is requested for a pure procedure (shared
text) file presently being executed.
[EACCES] Permission bits of the file mode do not permit the
requested access, or search permission is denied on a
component of the path prefix. The owner of a file has
permission checked with respect to the ``owner'' read,
write, and execute mode bits, members of the file's
group other than the owner have permission checked
with respect to the ``group'' mode bits, and all oth-
ers have permissions checked with respect to the
``other' ' mode bits.