Comment 2 for bug 185601
Revision history for this message
| Abdulaziz Ghuloum (aghuloum) wrote Re: Need to be able to test if process failed | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Question: if process returned nonblocking ports, or, if we have process-nonblocking to go with the rest of the nonblocking procedures, would that kind of solve this problem? (I still haven't found a solution)