The sparseness of the graph is the source of the behavior--cutting the edges down to 50 yields 61k sets. I tested using 0.6. So I don't think this is a bug.
Perhaps an optional parameter to limit the number of sets generated to deal with these kinds of situations would be useful.
The sparseness of the graph is the source of the behavior--cutting the edges down to 50 yields 61k sets. I tested using 0.6. So I don't think this is a bug.
Perhaps an optional parameter to limit the number of sets generated to deal with these kinds of situations would be useful.