Comment 2 for bug 746075

On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:54:47 -0000, Alexander Sack <email address hidden> wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Hi,
>
> packages that ask for EULA accept typically use a debconf question and
> store the user reponse in a debconf key, like shared/leb-
> license-v1.1-accepted
>
> With current lmc, it's inconvenient that a user gets asked to accept the
> same license once for EACH target install.
>
> fix is to remember shared/leb-license* keys and put them back in place
> for next target rootfs. In this way you only need to accept a license
> once on your host.

Hi,

A couple of comments/questions.

1) Are the LEBs themselves going to have EULAs?

2) What about EULAs for things in hwpacks. I guess we want to treat them
the same?

3) We probably want a whitelist here as you suggest, as re-using the
whole debconf configuration would probably lead to many problems.

Thanks,

James