Hold on Kilz !!!!!!!!!!!!!ill
For 2+ years Ubuntu 64 bit was and is the only O/S that will work and does
work on my 64 bit system.
On 3/24/07, Kilz <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> The gap in market share may get worse. 32bit hardware is no longer being
> sold or manufactured. The 64bit version of Ubuntu doesn't "just work". In
> fact on large segments of the Ubuntu English Forums people are told to
> install the 32bit version.
> Common complaints about the 64bit version are missing applications,
> inability to install some applications, and the inability to install 32bit
> applications as a stop gap measure. Multiarch has stalled in Debain. RPM
> based distro's are increasingly multiarch. SuSE is completely multiarch.
> All the while development of the 32bit version is the main priority of
> Ubuntu.
>
> --
> Microsoft has a majority market share
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/1
>
Hold on Kilz !!!!!!!!!!!!!ill
For 2+ years Ubuntu 64 bit was and is the only O/S that will work and does
work on my 64 bit system.
On 3/24/07, Kilz <email address hidden> wrote: /launchpad. net/bugs/ 1
>
> The gap in market share may get worse. 32bit hardware is no longer being
> sold or manufactured. The 64bit version of Ubuntu doesn't "just work". In
> fact on large segments of the Ubuntu English Forums people are told to
> install the 32bit version.
> Common complaints about the 64bit version are missing applications,
> inability to install some applications, and the inability to install 32bit
> applications as a stop gap measure. Multiarch has stalled in Debain. RPM
> based distro's are increasingly multiarch. SuSE is completely multiarch.
> All the while development of the 32bit version is the main priority of
> Ubuntu.
>
> --
> Microsoft has a majority market share
> https:/
>
-- adventures- with-the- rascals. blogspot. com/
>
http://