On 2010-12-05 tmodes wrote:
> The sieve2* switches are used to get a better distribution of the cps.
> As far as I unterstood the image is divided in sieve2width *
> sieve2height parts/rectangles. In each of it cpfind keeps only
> sieve2size control points.
Thank you for the explanation. That clears things up.
> If you want to use the setting on the image tab add "--sieve2width 1
> --sieve2height 1 --sieve1size %p" to the cpfind parameters. But then you
> will get a worser distribution of the cp.
Ok. I will set --sieve2width 3 --sieve2height 3 --sieve1size %p and
keep p at something like 2 or 3.
However I would still *like* to have my original wish: "Keep only the
best ten control points", somehow magically balancing quality and
distribution.
> I'm not sure if a complete support of all 3 parameters is really needed
> in the GUI.
[...]
I am quite happy with current single control for this setting, it
just should work.
On 2010-12-05 tmodes wrote:
> The sieve2* switches are used to get a better distribution of the cps.
> As far as I unterstood the image is divided in sieve2width *
> sieve2height parts/rectangles. In each of it cpfind keeps only
> sieve2size control points.
Thank you for the explanation. That clears things up.
> If you want to use the setting on the image tab add "--sieve2width 1
> --sieve2height 1 --sieve1size %p" to the cpfind parameters. But then you
> will get a worser distribution of the cp.
Ok. I will set --sieve2width 3 --sieve2height 3 --sieve1size %p and
keep p at something like 2 or 3.
However I would still *like* to have my original wish: "Keep only the
best ten control points", somehow magically balancing quality and
distribution.
> I'm not sure if a complete support of all 3 parameters is really needed
> in the GUI.
[...]
I am quite happy with current single control for this setting, it
just should work.
thanks for your assistance.
cu andreas