On Mon 13-Jan-2014 at 13:09 -0000, Andrew Travneff wrote:
>Sure, it's here (280MB), unmodified: http://www.ex.ua/538083568271
I'm still downloading the PNG file, but I noticed that it is
33352x4696 pixels. This is big but it should be fine with PNG. The
Vigra library used by Hugin/enblend has a hard limit of 2
gigapixels, and different TIFF libraries have a 2 or 4 gigabyte
filesize limit, but you are nowhere near this.
Is it possible that your image viewers only support a 32768 (2^15)
pixel maximum dimension? This would explain the artefacts in the
right hand side of the image.
- --
Bruno
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon 13-Jan-2014 at 13:09 -0000, Andrew Travneff wrote: www.ex. ua/538083568271
>Sure, it's here (280MB), unmodified: http://
I'm still downloading the PNG file, but I noticed that it is
33352x4696 pixels. This is big but it should be fine with PNG. The
Vigra library used by Hugin/enblend has a hard limit of 2
gigapixels, and different TIFF libraries have a 2 or 4 gigabyte
filesize limit, but you are nowhere near this.
Is it possible that your image viewers only support a 32768 (2^15)
pixel maximum dimension? This would explain the artefacts in the
right hand side of the image.
- --
Bruno
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFS1AE9FqO hwCjyCLoRArFhAJ 9szehSX7qgJtsJl Z50O9UxwAXTQQCf VCP0 U5w7KTfA=
2t4s/v3QSewODVz
=2+hd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----