Dear Lesnake.
On 19.06.2013 19:41, Lesnake wrote: > Public bug reported: > > cmake fails to finish with 3 errors. ... > -- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python (found version "2.7.4") > -- Found PythonLibs: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so (found suitable version "2.7.4", minimum required is "2.7.4") > CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:324 (FILE): > file STRINGS file > "/usr/include/python2.7;/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/python2.7/patchlevel.h" > cannot be read.
...
This is a bug in 2013.0-beta1 which already is fixed in the hugin svn. A patch for beta1 can be found at http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/hugin/2013.0.0~beta1+dfsg-3/50_9928ad3bd989_python_multiarch.diff
With kind regards
Stefan Peter
-- In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.
Dear Lesnake.
On 19.06.2013 19:41, Lesnake wrote: x86_64- linux-gnu/ libpython2. 7.so (found suitable version "2.7.4", minimum required is "2.7.4") python2. 7;/usr/ include/ x86_64- linux-gnu/ python2. 7/patchlevel. h"
> Public bug reported:
>
> cmake fails to finish with 3 errors.
...
> -- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python (found version "2.7.4")
> -- Found PythonLibs: /usr/lib/
> CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:324 (FILE):
> file STRINGS file
> "/usr/include/
> cannot be read.
...
This is a bug in 2013.0-beta1 which already is fixed in the hugin svn. A patch-tracker. debian. org/patch/ series/ view/hugin/ 2013.0. 0~beta1+ dfsg-3/ 50_9928ad3bd989 _python_ multiarch. diff
patch for beta1 can be found at
http://
With kind regards
Stefan Peter
--
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In
practice there is.