Comment 2 for bug 1842429

The usability of importing a list of files suggests that there is no difference between importing them separately or importing them as a group. That is why I was surprised when the results were different.

Would it be helpful if you treated the files, that are in the list, as separate sets of transactions? As if they were imported 1 by 1. This would mean that people could have multiple screens to agree to (one for each file). The difference between mass-import and separate import would disappear though and human checks would be identical. Doing 20 imports is a lot messier, than doing 1 import for 20 files.

The result would be ease of import, but the same human Ok to `similar` transactions. Does that help?

P.S. I assume from you comment, you do not use the FITID which should identify the transactions within an account uniquely?