Comment 8 for bug 619332
Revision history for this message
| Christof Mroz (christof-mroz) wrote Re: Fall-back mechanism failure | #8 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
René: How is point 1) going to cause problems at the I1 receiver? Of course, the I1 sender must be prepared of getting multiple replies etc. but it's running HIPL anyway.
Concerning Point 2) you're right. IMHO it should be retained as an (default-off) option for small-scale testing purposes.