Comment 1 for bug 357217

Revision history for this message
Keith Hughitt (keith-hughitt) wrote :

This relates to the asynchronous nature of the queries. All of the layers are queried simultaneously, and they are then added to the tileLayerManager in the order that the responses are recived, which is not guaranteed to match the order that the requests were sent.

The ideal approach to resolving this would be to add functionality to the TileLayerAccordion to support manual specification of placement, instead of always placing new layers at the end.