It is indeed unfortunate that the API requires you to know *both* the name and the UUID of the stack before you can fetch details about it directly.
That said, I am yet to be convinced that this is a major problem. It only takes one API call to figure out the name & UUID if you don't know them both already. In the context of the 5+ you're apparently doing (though I have no idea why) that seems fairly minimal.
> This will improve the performance of the use case.
It is indeed unfortunate that the API requires you to know *both* the name and the UUID of the stack before you can fetch details about it directly.
That said, I am yet to be convinced that this is a major problem. It only takes one API call to figure out the name & UUID if you don't know them both already. In the context of the 5+ you're apparently doing (though I have no idea why) that seems fairly minimal.
> This will improve the performance of the use case.
Do we have any evidence for this?