I'm not sure I understand this - we're not using the hash for access control or any sort of authentication, so why is it unsafe (other than that the tool says so)?
The main thing this patch will do, AFAICT, is force replacement for all nested stack resources, even if they've not changed their templates, which IMO is a pretty undesirable side-effect of this change.
I'm not sure I understand this - we're not using the hash for access control or any sort of authentication, so why is it unsafe (other than that the tool says so)?
The main thing this patch will do, AFAICT, is force replacement for all nested stack resources, even if they've not changed their templates, which IMO is a pretty undesirable side-effect of this change.