Comment 23 for bug 1652928

Revision history for this message
Sahdev Zala (spzala) wrote :

@Kanagaraj, np and thank you much for the quick feedback. So are we good with #2?

About #1, sorry but I didn't get the requirement completely. As we know, in my understanding the 'outputs' section which is optional in Heat or TOSCA or any other orchestration in general is a way to display some information to the user of template by an author of template.
Per original design in translator, if the input template has 'outputs' section the translator reads it and try to produce an available mapping in Heat. I am good changing/enhance this per Tacker's requirement but can you please provide more detail, ideally a blueprint with a small example that we can use to understand it better and later to test. Also, I believe this work probably is time consuming and can impact other other test templates we have too which you may agree with me too, can we consider this as a new feature that can be made available in 0.8.0 (not in 0.7.0 which is about to release). I am good on releasing 0.8.0 or 0.7.1 sooner than later when this feature, along with any other near term need from Tacker, is available. I sincerely hope you would agree with me here. Thanks!