Changing the on disk format for us is really no big deal.
Cheers,
-Brian
On May 11, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Lee Bieber wrote:
> ** Changed in: drizzle
> Importance: Undecided => High
>
> ** Also affects: drizzle/dexter
> Importance: High
> Assignee: Stewart Smith (stewart-flamingspork)
> Status: In Progress
>
> --
> innodb max index column length is 191, not 256 or 768 as one would "expect"
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578842
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Drizzle-
> developers, which is subscribed to Drizzle.
>
> Status in A Lightweight SQL Database for Cloud and Web: In Progress
> Status in Drizzle dexter series: In Progress
>
> Bug description:
> DICT_MAX_INDEX_COL_LEN
>
> was 768
>
> could be 1024
>
> or could be 768*4.
>
>
> <stewart> lbieber, 256*4 would be consistent with mysql in utf8 mode.
> <stewart> lbieber, and 768*4(3072) would be consistent with mysql in latin1
>
>
Hi!
Changing the on disk format for us is really no big deal.
Cheers,
-Brian
On May 11, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Lee Bieber wrote:
> ** Changed in: drizzle flamingspork) /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 578842 INDEX_COL_ LEN
> Importance: Undecided => High
>
> ** Also affects: drizzle/dexter
> Importance: High
> Assignee: Stewart Smith (stewart-
> Status: In Progress
>
> --
> innodb max index column length is 191, not 256 or 768 as one would "expect"
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Drizzle-
> developers, which is subscribed to Drizzle.
>
> Status in A Lightweight SQL Database for Cloud and Web: In Progress
> Status in Drizzle dexter series: In Progress
>
> Bug description:
> DICT_MAX_
>
> was 768
>
> could be 1024
>
> or could be 768*4.
>
>
> <stewart> lbieber, 256*4 would be consistent with mysql in utf8 mode.
> <stewart> lbieber, and 768*4(3072) would be consistent with mysql in latin1
>
>