I think that causing the application description to be changed goes a bit too far. Since upstream is active and involved, as long as they'll agree to support bug fixes in the Intrepid version, I think it's OK.
It brings to mind the gdesklets package that was in an immature state for Hardy. They had a large stack of bugs against he package initially, but after a good SRU, it was good. I give my ack for 0.20.0 final. Whoever sponsors should personally verify this bug is completely fixed. If you need help, let me know.
I think that causing the application description to be changed goes a bit too far. Since upstream is active and involved, as long as they'll agree to support bug fixes in the Intrepid version, I think it's OK.
It brings to mind the gdesklets package that was in an immature state for Hardy. They had a large stack of bugs against he package initially, but after a good SRU, it was good. I give my ack for 0.20.0 final. Whoever sponsors should personally verify this bug is completely fixed. If you need help, let me know.