On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:36:57PM -0000, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
> > The best solution to me is having separate packages for plugins (a
> single package for mostly used ones, and a gtg-plugins-others for niche
> ones) on top of gtg sources, so we avoid of publishing two separate
> source tarballs. In Debian/Ubuntu this is easily doable, I don't know
> about Fedora.
I agree. I think I'd suggest calling it gtg-plugins-extras rather than
-others as it seems to be more conventional.
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:36:57PM -0000, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
> > The best solution to me is having separate packages for plugins (a
> single package for mostly used ones, and a gtg-plugins-others for niche
> ones) on top of gtg sources, so we avoid of publishing two separate
> source tarballs. In Debian/Ubuntu this is easily doable, I don't know
> about Fedora.
I agree. I think I'd suggest calling it gtg-plugins-extras rather than
-others as it seems to be more conventional.