On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Luca Invernizzi <email address hidden> wrote:
> Just thought about it. Shouldn't this be handled directly from the gtk
> library (throwing a gigantic exception)?
I'm actually amazed the gtk main loop doesn't exit with an exception
if there's no available display... I don't quite know how to test for
it.
> --
> Running gtg when X is unavailable produces ugly error message
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519202
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gtg
> contributors, which is subscribed to Getting Things GNOME!.
>
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Luca Invernizzi <email address hidden> wrote:
> Just thought about it. Shouldn't this be handled directly from the gtk
> library (throwing a gigantic exception)?
I'm actually amazed the gtk main loop doesn't exit with an exception
if there's no available display... I don't quite know how to test for
it.
> -- /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 519202
> Running gtg when X is unavailable produces ugly error message
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gtg
> contributors, which is subscribed to Getting Things GNOME!.
>
--
Bertrand Rousseau