Comment 10 for bug 912958

Revision history for this message
juanjux (juanjux) wrote : Re: [Bug 912958] Re: Application not compilable

You will do fine, I hope you don't have many problems maintining the
source, there are ugly parts (like the threading :] ) but it's pretty
straightforward because usenet is a pretty simple protocol.

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Adrian Gruntkowski <
<email address hidden>> wrote:

> Ok, done with it. Wow, when I saw that appear on my account it felt like
> big burden falling on my shoulders :] Hope I will manage to handle it
> well enough. I will try to fix all the crash situations first (at least
> the reproducible ones) - that would be first maintenance release. From
> there we could see where to go feature-wise. Everybody interested in
> contributing please let me know via github, or eventually email ( adrian
> dot gruntkowski at [insert gmail dot com domain here] ).
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are the registrant for
> Groundhog Usenet Reader.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912958
>
> Title:
> Application not compilable
>
> Status in Groundhog Usenet Reader:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> Some source fioes seem to be missing in the bazaar repo.
> Please add them, I need to build the app to test my french translation,
> Plus I'd like to contribute to the code.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/groundhog/+bug/912958/+subscriptions
>