Comment 8 for bug 501228
Revision history for this message
| Paul Harrison (paul-francis-harrison) wrote | #8 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
The subbranch display is based on history records with a null "to" date (canon-branch.php / GetSubbranches).
To fix Bacchus Wood you could delete the canton history record, or give it a to date (20 April 2003?). To fix Krae Glas, you should delete the "to" date from its shire history record.
Is the history used in any computations or searches, or would just the current branch type and current branch parent be enough for everything? If the latter, I would advocate adding the current branch type and current parent branch to the branch table, and storing the branch history as a free-form text field, again in the branch table.