Comment 12 for bug 956416

Hum, in fact, we can let the functions: it may be handy (and it won't
break api) if someone wants to implement one of this signal, but we
shouldn't do anything in it.

Le vendredi 16 mars 2012 à 16:49 +0000, Pim Vullers a écrit :
> The question is whether granite, as a library, should catch these
> signals and act upon them. Does anybody recall why this was added in the
> first place?
>
> (As a side note, I just disabled the sig_handler and I did not have any
> segfault. I do not know what handles the signal now. Gtk?)
>