© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
a60fb26
(Get the code!)
Using a separate, standalone assembler (library or executable) might actually help re-defining the focus of the project, meaning that the complexity of this project would decrease, because it would rely on a separate project for assembling the source code, the sdcc project also relies on external assemblers such as "asXXXX". In addition, this would be a fairly powerful step, too because users could also use other external assemblers such as nasm if they want to.
This would probably be a good step to help the simulator become less monolithic and more modular, and most of the assembler-related shortcomings would be immediately solved, too.
So it's probably worth to think about this some more!