no you've misunderstood. the bug in question is bug #1106547 which i believe apport has misidentified as a dupe of this bug. #1076830 is irrelevant, and i shouldn't have mentioned it. it's similar but also not a dupe.
no you've misunderstood. the bug in question is bug #1106547 which i believe apport has misidentified as a dupe of this bug. #1076830 is irrelevant, and i shouldn't have mentioned it. it's similar but also not a dupe.