Gnocchi

  1. Bug #1576804
  2. Comment #1

Comment 1 for bug 1576804

Revision history for this message
Julien Danjou (jdanjou) wrote :

That makes sense.

We should take a step back and make the RBAC code more generic. I don't think it's wise to keep adding more Keystone related field (even if those are generally valid) in our indexer. We should figure something a bit more generic for our RBAC.